Home > News and Politics > ONE WOMAN’S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND+PCH ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT—COMMENTS DUE MONDAY

ONE WOMAN’S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND+PCH ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT—COMMENTS DUE MONDAY

ARTIST'S RENDITION: SECOND + PCH

EDITOR’S NOTE: The period for public comment on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the proposed multi-use (residential, retail, hotel) Second+PCH project closes today. Longtime resident and environmental activist  Lisa Rinaldi has already submitted her comment, and has offered a copy to Redistricted!  The DEIR can be read here and comments e-mailed to Long Beach Department of Development Services Senior Planner Jeff Winklepleck at jeffrey.winklepleck@longbeach.gov. Here’s what Rinaldi wrote:

Dear Mr. Winklepleck:

My comments on the DEIR for the Second+PCH project are set forth below.

(1) The proposed project violates existing SEADIP height limitations.

(2) The DEIR erroneously includes sidewalks, parking lots, building footprints and balconies among its open space measurements to calculate the 30% open space required by SEADIP. These are not “on-the-ground” areas for the purpose of calculating usable open space in accordance with SEADIP.

(3) (a) As stated in the DEIR, increased traffic cannot be mitigated. (b) The “potential improvement recommended to mitigate traffic” (at page IV.L-41, Mitigation Measure (a), L-1) is vague and bereft of detail regarding Shopkeeper Road. It describes restriping Shopkeeper Road and modifying the “signal accordingly”. Question (1): does this assume the oft-discussed extension of Shopkeeper Road? If so, there are significant environmental and coastal issues regarding such a proposal, which the DEIR has failed to address. It goes on to say, “Implementation of this improvement completely offsets the impact of the proposed project.” This is a sweeping assertion. Question (2):  how is this assertion arrived at?

(4) The proposed project violates existing SEADIP residential uses.

(5) The proposed project, with its 12-story heights, significant traffic increases (with accompanying air and noise pollution) and density will adversely affect the neighboring Los Cerritos Wetlands, as well as the fly-ways for birds.

(6) The DEIR says nothing of the Development Agreement announced at public meetings by the Director of Development Services.

(7) The DEIR says nothing of off-site improvements repeatedly and publicly touted by the applicant.

(8) The DEIR proclaims at page VI-3,E., “Precedent Setting Action” (drawing its conclusions from the “Land Use” section), that this “project would be consistent with the land use standards and would not result in any precedent-setting action.” [emphasis added] However, prefacing these conclusions, the DEIR enumerates amendments which would be required to four different plans to build its proposed project:  (1) SEADIP, (2) LCP, (3) Urban Design Component and (4) General Plan. In direct opposition to the DEIR’s assertions, amending the zoning requirements of SEADIP, LCP, Urban Design Component and General Plan is precedent-setting on a grand scale.

As regards SEADIP:  I am one among many citizens of this City who continuously questions why the zoning requirements of this historic plan are attacked over and over again. The tiresome history of those who would ride roughshod over SEADIP (and who have done so in the past) is reprehensible, to say the least. In the face of these repeated attacks on SEADIP, it is difficult to keep one’s cynicism in check.

Sincerely,

Lisa Rinaldi

Long Beach

Advertisements
  1. Gordana
    June 7, 2010 at 6:38 am

    Ms. Rinaldi isn’t alone in questioning why the city is allowing these challenges to SEADIP. And if folks arguing that SEADIP needs to be updated or ‘modernized’ to reflect the community’s vision for South East Long Beach, well then, get busy. Until we get an open,community-driven and meaningful re-evaluation for SEADIP the only redevelopment that will be allowed on that corner is defined by SEADIP right now. And that’s commercial use, low-rise (35′ maximum)and low-density (30%+ open space). Thanks to Ms. Rinaldi and others for reading that dreadful DEIR, doing the math, and holding City Hall accountable.

  2. Joe Weinstein
    June 7, 2010 at 2:15 pm

    NATURE has her own ‘Sea-Dip’ plan for disposing of all these projects, no matter how law-conforming the would-be investors claim to be or how economically clever they think they are. Within decades, projected permanently risen sea levels (understated: 1 foot by 2050, nearly 5 feet by 2100, and still rising) will SEA-DIP the entire project area (and much else of LB’s Lower East Side besides) under tidal waters. Traffic impacts will shift largely from land-cars to boats.

    Nature’s own Sea-Dip plan reflects the overwhelming economic commitment and power of past-years’ and today’s governments and big corporations (including entities like the Port of Long Beach)to more and more world-wide industry and commerce and resulting greenhouse gas emissions and climate-change effects.

    TOMORROW 8 June, 1-3:30 PM, ARE PUBLIC HEARINGS IN LONG BEACH (Airport Holiday Inn) taking input into a new National Research Council study, sponsored by various state and federal agencies (including Army Corps of Engineers), which by 2012 will update existing California sea-level rise projections to give more immediate, more accurate, and more certain values. These Long Beach hearings are the first of three statewide – the other two are next week in San Francisco and Eureka.

  3. jviale
    June 9, 2010 at 3:57 pm

    I agree with Lisa Rinaldi on each and every point she makes. Thanks for sharing this with us.

  1. June 23, 2010 at 9:55 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: